Comparison
ربات چت ناشناس ملوگپ vs Telegram Premium
A side-by-side look at two public Telegram channels — audience size, reach, engagement, growth and an audience-quality estimate, all from public data.
| Metric | @melogapm | @premiumrussia |
|---|---|---|
| Subscribers | 2.7M | 2.8M |
| Avg views | 6.4M | 7.3M |
| Engagement rate | 239.8% | 262.5% |
| 30-day growth | +13.2% | +1.8% |
| Language | فارسی | Русский |
| Category | — | — |
| Channel age | 2812 days | 1412 days |
Audience quality
An estimate from public metrics — we have no admin access to Telegram’s native analytics, so treat this as a signal, not a verdict.
@melogapm
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
@premiumrussia
Looks reliable
- Reach and engagement sit in a normal range for this size
We compare only what we observe from the public surface. Engagement rate is approximate (average views per subscriber) and audience quality is an estimate, not a verdict — see the methodology.